article currently undergoing extensive editing (May 14)
- How does the food chain get contaminated with plastic-derived chemicals?
- Micro- and Nanoplastics: Health Implications
- Sourcing the Menu: Avoiding Microplastics, biosolids and nano particles
According to How does the food chain get contaminated with plastic-derived chemicals?, plastic-derived chemical (PDC) contamination of basic foods, even those that do not undergo extensive processing, comes from :
- Contact with micro- and nanoplastics in the environment and leaching from contaminated soil and water during planting, irrigation, and growth.
- Exposure to plastics during harvest from conveyor belts, chutes, pipes, baffles and other equipment.
- Exposure to plastic in the washing process through the use of bins, tanks, implements and pipes.
- Exposure to plastics during the drying and packing stages including the use of recycled or coated cardboard.
However, ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have additional avenues of contamination from PDCs that are due to the residual contamination in additives, contamination from PDCs from additional contacts with plastic components, and the addition of fats which facilitate the transfer of lipid-soluble polymer components into the UPFs.
When does processing become “ultra?”
It’s vital to recognize that very few good products are unprocessed. Those would include items such as raw vegetables and eggs. Many more familiar foods are “minimally” processed including cookies, bread, pasteurized milk, raw meat, and chicken.
The line at which processing crosses the undesirable line is somewhat fuzzy.
This article from the British Medical Journal — Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort — notes that, “[A] 10% increase in the proportion of ultra-processed foods in the diet was associated with a significant increase of greater than 10% in risks of overall and breast cancer.”
The article places the blame on ultra-processed foods which it enumerates as:
“mass produced packaged breads and buns; sweet or savoury packaged snacks; industrialised confectionery and desserts; sodas and sweetened drinks; meat balls, poultry and fish nuggets, and other reconstituted meat products transformed with addition of preservatives other than salt (for example, nitrites); instant noodles and soups; frozen or shelf stable ready meals; and other food products made mostly or entirely from sugar, oils and fats, and other substances not commonly used in culinary preparations such as hydrogenated oils, modified starches, and protein isolates.”
It’s noteworthy that both sugars and salt — which are added to UPFs with a heavy hand — are contaminated with nano-and microplastics which have their own inherent PDC contamination issues.
The BMJ study heaps further ultra-processed scorn on,
“Industrial processes [that] notably include hydrogenation, hydrolysis, extruding, moulding, reshaping, and pre-processing by frying. Flavouring agents, colours, emulsifiers, humectants, non-sugar sweeteners, and other cosmetic additives are often added to these products to imitate sensorial properties of unprocessed or minimally processed foods and their culinary preparations or to disguise undesirable qualities of the final product.”
While the BMJ article focused on the nutritional downsides to processing, it’s vital to recognize that each processing operation and additive — regardless of nutritional value — brings with it its own unique contamination trail and chemical burdens that are incorporated into a highly processed food product for sale.
Why are Ultra-processed Foods (UPFs) higher in Plastic-Derived Chemicals (PDCs)?
The increased use of plastic to replace metal and glass components in food processing machinery means higher PDC levels in all foods regardless of whether the food is ultra-processed or minimally processed. However, increasing the number of processing steps increases the probability of a higher level of PDCs. (See citation links below photo)
Substances added to UPFs are also products of industrial processing methods whose techniques are not well-known due to trade secret issues.
UPF’s health issues derive not only from numerous additives, but also because of excessive levels of salt, sugar, and other sweeteners such as high-fructose corn syrup which are added as flavor enhancers thought to encourage over-eating. While micro- and nanoplastic particles are ubiquitous in our environment and food, every additional ultra-processing step not found in minimally processed foods adds to the overall diet’s PDC burden.
Plastic use in food processing : Sanitary, strong, versatile (with a dark side when ultra-used)
Plastic contact with food is increasing as it replaces food processing machinery which once relied almost entirely on glass and metal.
- Why do plastics stand up better than other materials in food processing applications
- New plastic food packaging could replace metal and glass
- Industrial Plastic Components for Food, Beverage & Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Plastics for food designed with safety in mind
- Plastic Materials for Food Processing and Packaging Machinery Applications
- FDA and USDA Compliant Plastics for the Food and Beverage Industry
- Advanced Food Safe Plastics for Food & Beverage Manufacturing
- Plastic materials for packaging, conveying, and food processing machinery
- Google Search: Plastic replaces metal in food processing
Lipophilia: for the love of fat
In the scientific terms, fats and oils are known as lipids. Lipophilia means a “love of lipids.” Fats tend to be solid (or relatively so) at room temperature and oils, liquid.
Inexpensive, mass-produced fats like those used in UPFs, involve frequent plastic contact. Significantly, BPA, phthalates and many other harmful environmental chemicals are “lipophilic” — they are easily dissolved in fats and oils.
This should not be surprising because most environmental chemicals — including endocrine disruptors and pesticides — are derived from petroleum. The same goes for artificial fragrances, flavor enhancers, and food coloring as well as plastics in general, and the printing inks used in them.
What this means is that contact between plastic and any form of food-based oil or fat results in increased migration of BPA, phthalates, and other lipophilic chemicals from the plastic and into the edible portions of the food.
Many well-designed, peer-reviewed, published studies have shown that Bisphenol A acts as an “obesogen” that can disrupt the metabolic process and result in the preferential storage of fat rather than its use as energy.
The migration of PDCs like BPA, phthalates, and other lipophilic chemicals is preferentially accelerated when placed in contact with lipids.
Added sugar and sweeteners.
Gerd Liebezeit & Elisabeth Liebezeit (2013) Non-pollen particulates
in honey and sugar, Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 30:12, 2136-2140, DOI: